Fabric Cost & Performance Audit


Your Fabric environment costs more than it should.

Here is why.

A forensic review that identifies what is driving cost, what is degrading performance, and what to fix first, with a prioritised action plan attached to every finding.



10+

years experience

5

operational domains

30

Point assessment

2-3

week delivery

THE PROBLEM


Fabric costs spiral in ways that are hard to diagnose from the inside

Microsoft Fabric gives organisations enormous capability. But without the right architecture and oversight, costs rise and performance degrades in ways that standard monitoring tools do not surface clearly.Cost and performance are rarely separate problems. A poorly designed pipeline does not just run slowly. It consumes capacity unnecessarily. A misconfigured semantic model does not just slow reports. It drives throttling that affects everything. Most organisations have both problems simultaneously and do not know where to start.

This audit is right for you if


  • Fabric capacity costs are rising and it is unclear why

  • Still on PAYG after migrating from Power BI Premium

  • No clear visibility into what is consuming CU capacity

  • Pipelines are slower than expected with no clear cause

  • Reports throttling or slow at peak usage times

  • Semantic model refreshes failing or running inconsistently

Why this audit is different


Most reviews examine individual workloads in isolation.This audit examines the relationships between capacity configuration, pipeline engineering, semantic model design, storage architecture, and workload scheduling as a connected system.Findings are prioritised by business impact, implementation effort, risk reduction, and cost savings. The outcome is a practical remediation roadmap, not a list of technical observations.

What the audit examines


Capacity & licensing

Whether your current SKU and licensing structure is costing more than your workloads actually require

Workload patterns

What is consuming capacity, when, and whether scheduling conflicts are degrading performance across the platform

Pipeline architecture

Where design inefficiencies are simultaneously slowing delivery and driving unnecessary CU consumption

Storage efficiency

Whether your data layer is structured to support both query performance and cost efficient storage

Reporting load

How semantic model design and refresh patterns are affecting both report speed and overall capacity health

Workspace configuration

Platform settings and structural decisions quietly working against both cost efficiency and performance reliability


How it works


1

Complete the intake form

Confirms your environment is within scope. Takes under two minutes. No commitment at this stage.

2

Receive your proposal

Scope confirmed and proposal sent to your email within 24 hours. No commitment at this stage.

3

Audit delivered

Read-only access provided. Findings delivered within the agreed timeframe, followed by a live readout session with your team.

What you receive


  • Written audit report with findings and risk ratings across cost and performance

  • Prioritised remediation plan showing what to fix first and why

  • Cost reduction estimates and performance improvement recommendations per finding

  • Maturity scorecard across five operational domains

  • Live readout session with your team

  • Practical remediation roadmap prioritised by impact, effort, and risk

Maturity scorecard


Five operational domains, scored and ranked

One of the key deliverables you receive is a maturity scorecard rating your Fabric environment across five operational domains. Each domain receives a specific rating, improvement recommendations, and prioritised next steps.

Capacity Management

Workload Optimisation

Storage & Data Architecture

Semantic Layer Efficiency

Operational Governance

You leave with a clear picture of where your platform stands across every dimension and a prioritised roadmap showing exactly what to address first.

Engagement scope


  • Up to 3 Fabric capacities

  • Up to 20 pipelines and dataflows combined

  • One stakeholder readout session

  • Up to 10 workspaces

  • Up to 5 semantic models

  • Practical remediation roadmap Delivered within 2 to 3 weeks

Environments exceeding these parameters are scoped individually. The intake form confirms fit before any commitment is made.

What is not included


  • Access provisioning or infrastructure changes during the audit

  • More than one readout session

  • Post delivery support beyond 14 days of report delivery

  • Workspaces or capacities outside the agreed scope boundary

Engagement fee

Euro

3,000


50% on engagement start
50% on report delivery
Larger environments scoped individually

Many clients choose to act on the findings with a follow up optimisation engagement. That conversation happens at the readout session, not before.

About


Emmanuel Obikili

Microsoft Fabric Architect & Consultant

I have spent years delivering Power BI and data platform solutions across financial services, professional services, and the public sector. Since Microsoft Fabric launched, I have focused almost entirely on helping organizations architect, optimize, and get measurable value from their Fabric investment.The cost and performance audit came from a pattern I kept seeing. Environments where something was clearly wrong but nobody could pinpoint where. I built a structured diagnostic approach to surface exactly that.I work independently under my own name. Every audit is conducted by me personally, not delegated

Get in touch


Ready to find out what is really driving your Fabric costs?

Complete the short form and I will confirm scope and send a proposal within 24 hours. No commitment required at this stage.

Read-only access only · Scope confirmed before any work begins


[email protected] · linkedin.com/in/emmanuel-obikili · audit.eobikili.co.ukEmmanuel Obikili is a trading name of Beautiful I Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. Company No. 13761116.